As the new school year begins, it
is useful for families and teachers to think about how to make the best of the
high school year, especially if this if the final secondary school year.
Planning for the change from school to life beyond school should be a secondary
school priority.
Teacher and family planning for
transition to life after secondary school for students experiencing disability
has been a difficult and frustrating process in many instances. To understand
this difficult reality and to contribute to creating positive transition
planning, the Marsha Forest Centre undertook a study of the planning situation.
We interviewed teachers, parents, and students who had experienced transition
planning or were now involved in it. As I describe the study and its findings,
I will insert comments made by teachers, parents, and students about their
experiences and about the book, Planning for Real Life After School: Ways for
Families and Teachers to Plan for Students Experiencing Significant Challenge,
that resulted from our study. People First Ontario and the Canadian Abilities
Foundation were our partners, and Inclusion Press of Toronto assisted us in
publishing and distributing the book.
Our overall finding was that,
whereas a few secondary schools and families collaborated closely on planning,
this was not the experience of most. As transition from secondary school is the
doorway to adult life in the community, the lack of collaborative planning was
disturbing.
From what we were told during the
interviews, it seemed that families and teachers did not work well together
because they did not understand each other’s viewpoints. This was the root of
the problems we found. They were not a team working together on this important
process.
Teachers tended to be optimistic
regarding the transition planning process, at least from the school’s
perspective. Various teacher comments indicated that many, but not all parents,
were not heavily involved in planning. Most teachers appeared to approach
transition planning as their responsibility and to be carried through with only
modest family involvement.
We had planned to write a
resource manual that would be like a recipe book for collaborative transition
planning. After our interviews, we decided that we had to go back quite a few
steps. It was not safe to assume that schools and families had the background
to work collaboratively. There was no deliberate plan for teachers to exclude
family members and no intention by parents to take responsibility away from
teachers. However, there was troublesome mutual misunderstanding in many
situations. We needed to describe the ingredients for positive transition
planning before we got to trying out the recipe.
We then set about trying to
explain the reality of the school situation to the families, and the reality of
the family situation to the schools. We put what teachers, parents, and
students told us into the book. In fact, we ended up with two versions of the
book. One was written at a high school level. The second was written in a plain
language format at an elementary level for anyone whose reading skills were
modest. We wanted to make certain that our readers would understand us,
particularly in the case of students, but also for families whose first
language was not English.
The set of books includes descriptions of the
situation of schools and families. It also contains a description of a
collaborative family-school workshop preparing families and students for
transition. Recommendations drawn from what families and teachers told us, and
description of person-centered planning strategies that have proven their value
in planning for the future of persons experiencing disabilities completed the
book.
The last thing we did was to send a draft of the book to all teachers,
parents, and students we interviewed. We wanted to use their feedback to
evaluate the books and revise them as necessary. We wanted to ensure that those
we interviewed had significant input at all levels of what we were doing.
Minimal revision was called for. Feedback from teachers, parents, and students
was strongly positive with regard to the contribution made by the books.
Typical feedback comments from teachers and
families are given below.
Teachers:
Families:
Complimentary copies were then
sent to all who participated in the study and to every English language school
system in Canada, as well as to various advocate and other support groups. A
number of school systems across Canada have asked for additional copies of the
book so that all their teachers involved in transition planning can benefit
from the results of our study. Contact the Marsha Forest Centre and Inclusion
Press at www.inclusion.com
Please note: A funding
contribution by the Government of Canada Social Development Partnerships
Program, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada assisted us with this
project.
Important Survey on End of Life Services for People with Disabilities
Landscape of Literacy and Disability (Canadian Abilities Foundation publication) by Ezra Zubrow, et al.
Comments